National Athletic Trainers' Association Bridge Statement: Management of Sport-Related Concussion.

OBJECTIVE: To provide athletic trainers and team physicians with updated recommendations to the 2014 National Athletic Trainers' Association (NATA) concussion position statement regarding concussion management, specifically in the areas of education, assessment, prognostic factors, mental health, return to academics, physical activity, rest, treatment, and return to sport. BACKGROUND: Athletic trainers have benefited from the 2 previous NATA position statements on concussion management, and although the most recent NATA position statement is a decade old, knowledge gains in the medical literature warrant updating several (but not all) recommendations. Furthermore, in various areas of the body of literature, current evidence now exists to address items not adequately addressed in the 2014 statement, necessitating the new recommendations. This document therefore serves as a bridge from the 2014 position statement to the current state of concussion evidence, recommendations from other organizations, and discrepancies between policy and practice. RECOMMENDATIONS: These recommendations are intended to update the state of the evidence concerning the management of patients with sport-related concussion, specifically in the areas of education; assessment advances; prognostic recovery indicators; mental health considerations; academic considerations; and exercise, activity, and rehabilitation management strategies.

[Research progress of magnesium and magnesium alloy implants in sports medicine].

Objective: To review the research progress of magnesium and magnesium alloy implants in the repair and reconstruction of sports injury. Methods: Relevant literature of magnesium and magnesium alloys for sports injury repair and reconstruction was extensively reviewed. The characteristics of magnesium and its alloys and their applications in the repair and reconstruction of sports injuries across various anatomical sites were thoroughly discussed and summarized. Results: Magnesium and magnesium alloys have advantages in mechanical properties, biosafety, and promoting tendon-bone interface healing. Many preclinical studies on magnesium and magnesium alloy implants for repairing and reconstructing sports injuries have yielded promising results. However, successful clinical translation still requires addressing issues related to mechanical strength and degradation behavior, where alloying and surface treatments offer feasible solutions. Conclusion: The clinical translation of magnesium and magnesium alloy implants for repairing and reconstructing sports injuries holds promise. Subsequent efforts should focus on optimizing the mechanical strength and degradation behavior of magnesium and magnesium alloy implants. Conducting larger-scale biocompatibility testing and developing novel magnesium-containing implants represent new directions for future research.

The initial visibility of updated recommendations on preseason heat safety in high school athletics among United States athletic trainers.

Updated recommendations on preseason heat safety in high school (HS) athletics ("2021 Consensus Statements") were published in April 2021. This cross-sectional survey study explored the initial roll-out of the 2021 Consensus Statements, including their visibility among United States HS athletic trainers (ATs) and perceived levels of confidence in implementing them. Recruitment occurred first, from a random selection of ATs from the Board of Certification, Inc., and second, an open invitation via social media. An online cross-sectional questionnaire had participating ATs note whether they had seen the 2021 Consensus Statements. If yes, ATs reported their perceived level of confidence in implementing them (5-point-ordinal scale from "not at all confident" to "very confident); if no, ATs disclosed (open-ended) why they had not yet seen them. Descriptive statistics were calculated for quantitative variables; template analysis identified codes related to visibility of and confidence in implementing 2021 Consensus Statements. Nearly half (45.7%) of 116 responding HS ATs reported having seen at least one 2021 Consensus Statements; 23.3% had reviewed all three. Common reasons among the 63 that had not seen them included: not aware they were published (n = 22), have yet to read them (n = 19), and believed they could not access the journal (n = 10). Of the 53 ATs having seen at least one of the 2021 Consensus Statements, 67.9% (n = 36) were very/fairly confident in implementing them at their HS. Reasons for confidence included their schools ensuring up-to-date EHI prevention and management practices (n = 18) and athletics constituent support (n = 8). This exploratory study observed proportions of surveyed HS ATs that had not seen the 2021 Consensus Statements and were not confident in implementing them. Findings highlight the need to continue improving messaging about access to best-practice recommendations. Further, continued efforts inclusive of active and passive dissemination strategies across all athletics constituents are needed to aid proper implementation.

The Future of Artificial Intelligence in Sports Medicine and Return to Play.

Artificial intelligence (AI) has shown tremendous growth over the last decade, with the more recent development of clinical applications in health care. The ability of AI to synthesize large amounts of complex data automatically allows health care providers to access previously unavailable metrics and thus enhance and personalize patient care. These innovations include AI-assisted diagnostic tools, prediction models for each treatment pathway, and various tools for workflow optimization. The extension of AI into sports medicine is still early, but numerous AI-driven algorithms, devices, and research initiatives have delved into predicting and preventing athlete injury, aiding in injury assessment, optimizing recovery plans, monitoring rehabilitation progress, and predicting return to play.

The International Olympic Committee framework on fairness, inclusion and nondiscrimination on the basis of gender identity and sex variations does not protect fairness for female athletes.

The International Olympic Committee (IOC) recently published a framework on fairness, inclusion, and nondiscrimination on the basis of gender identity and sex variations. Although we appreciate the IOC's recognition of the role of sports science and medicine in policy development, we disagree with the assertion that the IOC framework is consistent with existing scientific and medical evidence and question its recommendations for implementation. Testosterone exposure during male development results in physical differences between male and female bodies; this process underpins male athletic advantage in muscle mass, strength and power, and endurance and aerobic capacity. The IOC's "no presumption of advantage" principle disregards this reality. Studies show that transgender women (male-born individuals who identify as women) with suppressed testosterone retain muscle mass, strength, and other physical advantages compared to females; male performance advantage cannot be eliminated with testosterone suppression. The IOC's concept of "meaningful competition" is flawed because fairness of category does not hinge on closely matched performances. The female category ensures fair competition for female athletes by excluding male advantages. Case-by-case testing for transgender women may lead to stigmatization and cannot be robustly managed in practice. We argue that eligibility criteria for female competition must consider male development rather than relying on current testosterone levels. Female athletes should be recognized as the key stakeholders in the consultation and decision-making processes. We urge the IOC to reevaluate the recommendations of their Framework to include a comprehensive understanding of the biological advantages of male development to ensure fairness and safety in female sports.

A strategy to implement the American College of Sports Medicine's Exercise is Medicine® (EIM) initiative in a community oncology clinic.

PURPOSE: Despite proven benefits, few cancer patients exercise during chemotherapy. The American College of Sports Medicine's Exercise is Medicine® (EIM) initiative describes a model to integrate exercise into oncology care, based upon assessing patients' ability to exercise safely, advising on exercise benefits, and referring patients to exercise. We developed and tested a strategy to implement EIM in a community-based oncology clinic, to assess-advise-refer 20 patients undergoing chemotherapy to a 3-month online exercise class, and measured implementation outcomes. METHODS: Using a community-based provider participation in research (CBPPR) model, researchers and staff co-designed and tested a 4-level implementation strategy, with a goal of assessing-advising-referring 20 cancer patients to exercise. Surveys and interviews were conducted with 12 (100%) staff at baseline and post-implementation on acceptability/appropriateness/feasibility, perceptions of individual implementation roles, and organizational strengths/conditions. Data were analyzed using correlations, t-tests, and content analysis. RESULTS: The proposed strategy was revised in collaboration with staff who requested assistance for recruitment and data collection. EIM was successfully implemented with 41 (92%) patients assessed, 37 (90%) advised, and 22 (60%) referred to exercise classes. Barriers to implementation were staff shortages and time constraints; facilitators included research team supports. Staff's perceived organizational strengths were positively correlated with exercise promotion acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility. There were no statistically significant changes in implementation outcomes (acceptability/appropriateness/feasibility) post-implementation. CONCLUSIONS: Using a collaborative model, EIM was successfully implemented in a community oncology clinic; however, the clinic required significant support from the research team. Adaptations to the EIM process may be required to improve implementation outcomes.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Sports Medicine and the Importance of Diversity.

Within orthopedics surgery as a specialty, sports medicine is one of the least diverse surgical subspecialties. Differences in minority representation between patient and provider populations are thought to contribute to disparities in care, access, and outcomes.

Efforts to Improve Diversity, Equality, and Inclusion in Sports Medicine via Community Engagement Initiatives Within American Cities Divided by Racial, Social, and Economic Factors.

Although the twenty-first century has seen major advances in evidence-based medicine to improve health, athletic performance, and injury prevention, our inability to implement these best practices across underserved American communities has limited the impact of these breakthroughs in sports medicine. Rochester, NY is stereotypical of American communities in which an economically challenged racially diverse urban center with grossly underperforming public schools is surrounded by adequately resourced predominantly Caucasian state-of-the-art education systems. As these great disparities perpetuate and further degrade our society in the absence of interventions, the need for community engagement initiatives is self-evident.

Trends for Diversity in Orthopedic Sports Medicine.

Despite the increasingly diverse population of the United States, orthopedic surgery continues to lag other medical specialties in terms of diversity. It remains the specialty with the lowest percentage of women, and White physicians dominate the field, especially in leadership positions. Although the trends are slowly moving in the right direction, additional efforts must be taken to further diversify the field. A targeted, multifaceted approach is required to enhance awareness, educate, mentor, and develop future leaders. Such an approach has recently been established by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine, which will hopefully improve future minority and female representation.

Gender Equity Efforts in Sports Medicine.

Great progress has been made toward gender equality in athletics, whereas true equality has not yet been realized. Concurrently, women orthopedists along with advocate men have paved the way toward gender equity in orthopedics as a whole and more specifically in sports medicine. The barriers that contribute to gender disparities include lack of exposure, lack of mentorship, stunted career development, childbearing considerations and implicit gender bias and overt gender discrimination.